boilerplate image
Your daily serving of high school news and policy.

Latest PISA Results Show American Students Hold Steady in Reading and Science Performance, Slip Significantly in Math

RSS feed

December 06, 2016 02:16 pm


The performance of U.S. fifteen-year-olds in mathematics “fell significantly,” while science and reading performance was little changed since 2012, according to the latest results from the Programme for International Student Achievement (PISA), which were released this morning by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

“We’re losing ground—a troubling prospect when, in today’s knowledge-based economy, the best jobs can go anywhere in the world,” said U.S. Secretary of Education John King. “Students in Massachusetts, Maryland, and Minnesota aren’t just vying for great jobs along with their neighbors or across state lines, they must be competitive with peers in Finland, Germany, and Japan.”

As shown in the table below, U.S. performance slipped by 1 percentage point in science and reading since 2012 but 11 percentage points in mathematics.

US PISA 2015 scores

Compared to students from the more than seventy countries and economies who took the test, American students performed around the international average in science and reading but below average in mathematics. Compared to the thirty-five countries in the OECD,[1] the United States ranked nineteenth in science, twentieth in reading, and thirty-first in mathematics. The table below represents student performance of selected countries and economies on PISA. (Names listed in blue are partner countries and economies in PISA 2015.) Scores shaded in blue are above the OECD average, scores in white are equal to the OECD average, and scores in yellow are below the OECD average. For a complete list of the rankings, visit

PISA 2015 rankings

In a statement, Alliance for Excellent Education President Bob Wise calls the latest PISA rankings the “shiny bow on top of the PISA present,” and stresses that the additional data and analysis contained in the PISA results will “prove invaluable to policymakers in the coming months and years.”

While the overall U.S. performance fell far behind top performers, such as Singapore, Japan, and Canada, the United States made the biggest improvement in equity from 2006 to 2015, increasing its percentage of “resilient students”—defined as disadvantaged students who perform better than predicted by their socioeconomic status—by 12 percentage points, as shown in the below image from the report.

PISA 2015 resilient students

“Among OECD, there’s not a country that has been more successful in closing the socioeconomic gap than the United States,” Andreas Schleicher, director for education and skills and special advisor on education policy to the Secretary-General at the OECD, said to Education Week.

American students also show more interest in science than their international peers, with 38 percent of fifteen-year-olds expecting to work in a science-related career at age thirty, compared to 24 percent of students internationally.

“American students have a much higher interest in science than their international peers,” Wise said. “The challenge for the nation is converting interest into impact and ensuring that American students are the ones making medical discoveries or creating the latest Silicon Valley start-up. Doing so means closing gaps in access to high-quality science instruction. According to PISA, advantaged students receive roughly fifty minutes more in science instruction per week in school than their disadvantaged peers.”

In its research note on U.S. performance, the OECD offers five policy pillars to improve teaching and learning while promoting equity. These recommendations draw upon the experiences of Canada, Estonia, Germany, and Hong Kong, which, the report notes, “have all attained high levels of performance with high or improving levels of equity.”

  1. A clear education strategy to improve performance and equity should be implemented.
  2. Rigorous and consistent standards should be applied across all classrooms.
  3. Teacher and school leader capacity should be improved.
  4. Resources should be distributed equitably across schools—preferentially to those schools and students that need them most.
  5. At-risk students and schools should be proactively targeted.

In a column for the New York Times, Amanda Ripley, senior fellow at the Emerson Collective and author of Smartest Kids in the World, notes that the United States has implemented only one of these recommendations at scale—the college- and career-ready standards, including the Common Core State Standards, that have been adopted and implemented in every state.

Ripley writes that Schleicher did not expect the new standards to boost America’s PISA scores because there were only in place for a year in many states, but Schleicher remains a believer.

“I’m confident the Common Core is going to have a long-term impact,” Schleicher told Ripley. “Patience may be the biggest challenge.”

Ripley also passed along some advice from Schleicher for President-Elect Donald Trump. “Your president-elect has promised to make America great again,” Schleicher said. “He won’t be able to do that without fixing education.”

Key Findings from PISA 2015 for the United States is available at

[1] The thirty-five OECD countries are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States.


Join the Conversation

Your email is never published nor shared.

What is this?
Multiply 3 by 5 =
The simple math problem you are being asked to solve is necessary to help block spam submissions.



Every Child a Graduate. Every Child Prepared for Life.